resolution #1.

happy new year everyone! may 2009 be successful and better in every imaginable way, whatever that means to each of you.

my first resolution is to actually write stuff in my blog(s) instead of just thinking about (writing about) them. i'll be back with a vengeance in 2009. read y'all later!

lighten the load.

in case you're anywhere near helsinki, and wondering what to do, i'm dj'ing tomorrow at beatroot from 9pm till 2am. expect anything and everything, from light electropop to 90's dance gems and shitty house.

merry merry merry.

have yerself a soothing holiday!

ghosts.

a meme i received at facebook... it's absurd enough to make absolutely no sense, but does reveal something about the musical preferences of the person. or not.

i challenge anu, sugar kane, maire, rokkihomo, m, and the rest of you who feel like up to it.

***
Instructions:

1. Put your iTunes/Napster/Zune Player/WinAmp/etc on shuffle.
2. For each question, press the next button to get your answer.
3. YOU MUST WRITE THAT SONG NAME DOWN NO MATTER HOW SILLY IT SOUNDS!
4. Tag 10 or more friends who might enjoy doing this as well as the person you got it from.

********************
********************
1. IF SOMEONE SAYS "IS THIS OKAY" YOU SAY?
atlantis to interzone

2. WHAT WOULD BEST DESCRIBE YOUR PERSONALITY?
untitled

3. WHAT DO YOU LIKE IN A GUY/GIRL?
elämänperhonen

4. HOW DO YOU FEEL TODAY?
feel good hit of the fall

5. WHAT IS YOUR LIFE'S PURPOSE?
crystal

6. WHAT IS YOUR MOTTO?
prayers for rain

7. WHAT DO YOUR FRIENDS THINK OF YOU?
ride the lights

8. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR PARENTS?
twenty-four hours

9. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT VERY OFTEN?
like it or not

10. WHAT IS 2+2?
crazy

11. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR BEST FRIEND?
victoria

12. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
auf achse

13. WHAT IS YOUR LIFE STORY?
honey honey

14. WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BE WHEN YOU GROW UP?
crocodiles in the sky

15. WHAT DO YOU THINK WHEN YOU SEE THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
take me anywhere

16. WHAT DO YOUR PARENTS THINK OF YOU?
into the white

17. WHAT WILL YOU DANCE TO AT YOUR WEDDING?
intermission

18. WHAT WILL THEY PLAY AT YOUR FUNERAL?
the chameleon

19. WHAT IS YOUR HOBBY/INTEREST?
poika nimeltä päivi

20. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR FRIENDS?
valentina

21. WHATS THE WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN?
don't make me come to vegas

22. HOW WILL YOU DIE?
anything can stop us

23. WHAT IS THE ONE THING YOU REGRET?
cyborg

24. WHAT MAKES YOU LAUGH?
the silver series

25. WHAT MAKES YOU CRY?
nobody knows

26. WILL YOU EVER GET MARRIED?
season of illusions

27. WHAT SCARES YOU THE MOST?
the boy that never lied

28. DOES ANYONE LIKE YOU?
1 2 3 4

29. IF YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME, WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE?
suffer well

30. WHAT HURTS RIGHT NOW?
we are louder

31. WHAT WILL YOU POST THIS AS?
ghosts

poni hoax.

lotsa great music these days comes from paris. when poni hoax came out with their involutive star ep last year with an incredible mix by joakim, i knew something special was in the air: their music is a crazy mix of italo disco and post punk, confused bleeps and trashy basslines.

here's their new and slightly strange (but alluring) video for the song "antibodies" directed by danakil. (warning: gruesome animal cruelty.)

n.e.r.d.

last week pharrell and his crew were in helsinki performing at kulttuuritalo. going to the show was somewhat random since i only know two songs by them, "provider" and "she wants to move". i kept expecting some familiar tunes, but was told they were only produced by the neptunes and not by n.e.r.d... well what do i know. bummer.

crazy knits.

i'm stoked to find überknits galore at stores for mere mortals. i'd love a piece by sandra backlund, but i fear being mistaken for a work from the museum of contemporary art wearing her stunning handiwork...

therefore the gems topshop is offering are more than welcome. the small collection by simone shailes is wearable but quirky.

vanity sizing.

the fact that sizing has changed cannot be challenged: i wore 27-28" jeans when i was at my thinnest at 48kg (106lbs) in 2001, i go for 26-27" now that i'm a healthy(?) 56kg (124lbs). i used to be a US6, but now the older (and definitely not thinner) me needs a US0 or US2. nevertheless, this particular rant is not created by american brands such as gap which are known for catering to the whims of the world's fattest people, but by zara, the spanish high-street brand that has held a special place in my heart partially because of their predictable sizing. i still buy their tops in a medium because of my height, but require an extra small for dresses and pants. if they enlarge their sizes, i will need a seamstress which means bye-bye for me.

we all know that the claim that marilyn monroe was a size 12 is both true and untrue: she was a 12 of her time and probably about a 4 now. vanity sizing is a phenomenon that's been talked about in the press for years now. it is called "vanity sizing" because the favorite explanation given is that women want to feel thinner and a smaller number on the tag will convince them that they've gone down a size no matter what the reality. if made to choose between two garments, they'll go for the one with the smaller size rather than the one they like better initially. hence, women seem to be vain and stupid... and believe in xray-vision (which goes with stupid, i guess). some might deserve the stigma of vanity and fluff-headedness, since i do recall a girl from my high school who refused to buy anything bigger than size 8... i'm sure she's grown up by now.

there are other plausible explanations for the variety in sizing and why standardized charts, such as EN 13402, could create problems for manufacturers. for example, it could be argued that different demographics (in addition to men and women, that is) require different sizing charts, and stores that cater for construction workers and those that cater for ballerinas should use entirely different standards, i.e. one cannot expect to be a medium at both stores. then again, this argument is faulty, since there is no reason why the minute tutus and hulk-sized overalls should be available in all sizes: ballerinas could remain sizes xxs-m and construction workers can start from medium and run all the way to 5xl, if needed. right? my point is that rather than basing sizing on demographics, a standard sizing chart works partially for all -- even those who are small for a construction worker or huge for a ballerina. no-one in this world requires that a clothing manufacturer produces flannel shirts in a size xs.

in any case, my rant is not based on the fact that when i go to a new store, i do not automatically know my size. i also kinda get the idea that if i'm looking for a ballet leotard, i may need to start at a large rather than small. i'd be ecstatic if i did more-or-less know my size, since it would save me the hassle of dragging several identical garments into the dressing room and, moreover, would prolly mean i'd try stuff on more frequently in stores i don't normally shop at. that said, my complaint is that i have to guess my size at stores i've shopped in for years. since even designer brands aren't immune to vanity sizing, i cannot trust online shopping as i used to.

am i the only one who does not give a rat's bum about the number on the label but would really, thank you very much, like to be able to go, pick a consistent size, try it on for fit and color, decide whether the style was right for my body shape and buy it, rather than asking for several sizes in each garment, twitching like an ostrich trying on different sizes in the first style, getting frustrated, and eventually storming out of the store without buying anything?

must it be this hard?

the melodic one.

kitsuné maison compilation #6 is out. for those of you who are familiar with their previous compilations, the melodic one comes as a pleasantly easy listening experience. the french label produces tracks which are dj favorites at indie clubs everywhere -- when i'm feeling particularly lazy, i just pack my kitsuné compilations and a few 7" gems for a two hour set and i'm fine -- but their compilations so far have been slightly uneven when it comes to combining electropop and experimental roughness.

minimix here.

a book about helsinki.

the launch of bulgaria's a book about helsinki 2nd edition was last friday. the party was held at motellet -- probably for the size of the bar since the place itself is so midtown-jocks-and-prom-pom-poms, it scares me. nah, we did not stay long, but grabbed copies of the book and headed towards erottaja.

the first edition of "you should be here" came out just in time for the eurovision song contest in 2007, and the second one continues in the same path, only much sturdier, i.e. thicker, this time around. the book is not your traditional guide book, but rather a beautifully shot photographic reflection of the life of helsinki hipsterdom (for the lack of a better word which no doubt the creators would sneer at as true hipsters should. haha. sorry.) it's sarcastic, but gentle towards most of its depicted objects. very limited in its choice of content and viewpoint, it is not the book to turn to when trying to find historical walks around the city, but an informative and ambitious inside joke which challenges official city boundaries creating an alternative urban picture of the city -- similar to creating a guide book to manhattan where nothing between 14th and 110th street really exists and quick transportation to brooklyn was constantly recommended. in all honesty, i'd be happy with such a nyc guide book as long as circle line was included...

since all my favorite bars, stores, bands, and my apartment building are listed there, it is the only guide book i'd recommend to any of my friends visiting helsinki.

missoni home. and a rant-a-thon...

finally my missoni home cushions arrived. missoni, the italian fashion house known for their knits with kaleidoscopic patterns no-one quite compares to, have such a signature style and eye for color schemes that just browsing through their fabric samples leaves one short of breath. if you wanna do stripe, there's no better way than missoni.

my cushions are from their balbianello line of fresh satin cottons. lovely.



***
and then on to the rant.

one reason i order online is because many items are not available in finland, and even if they were, getting the exact product may be difficult due to various reasons such as the retailer being unwilling or unable to order something because they're a small distributor. another reason is that i like the convenience of it. provided everything goes right, that is...

this time the finnish post together with the courier had me infuriated. i waited for my parcel at home only to find out in the tracking system that "consignee was not in" when delivery was attempted. after calling the courier i was informed that codes at doors and gates -- which are standard everywhere midtown helsinki -- would prevent delivery although i did inform the courier that there would be codes. it said that right on top of the parcel. since my own post office was responsible for the delivery at this point, this sounded like a pretty lame excuse: they deliver the rest of my mail just fine and dandy.

well, supposedly they attempted delivery twice. there was no note informing me of the whereabouts of my parcel or the attempts. only after calling did i find out i would have to fetch the parcel from my local post office.

so it seems the finnish post offers a service they cannot live up to. since there are codes at every door in my neighborhood, this must mean that the finnish post does not do home deliveries in my area. naturally, i informed my retailer in the uk and demanded a refund on my postage: if i wanted to stand in line at xmas time at my post office, i surely was not going to pay them 30 quid for it.

sleek chic.

my perpetual hunt for the perfect messenger bag may have come to an end. perfection, for me, requires excellent quality leather which ages beautifully and does not lose its shape, great artisanship, no visible or extremely discreet brand logos and a design that's androgynous, functional and clean cut to a point of being minimal. i have been weighing the pros and cons of a mulberry messenger for quite some time, but dislike brass hardware and have not found one in exactly the right size for my needs.

entermodal may just fulfill every requirement with their "mobile" or their slightly smaller, but yet sleeker "revere" bag. each bag is handmade in portland, oregon and the company prides itself in supporting local industries and promoting a dying trade. they use toxin free and sustainably harvested tannins on their leathers, ionized aluminum for hardware because of its high recycled content, and the bags are designed with up-cycling in mind, i.e. they're easy to take apart and use the materials for something else if desired. handcrafted luxury does not come cheap as "mobile" (pictured left and right) retails at $1475 and "revere" (centre) at $775, but compared to other luxury brands their prices are nothing spectacular.



available online at juno & jove.

upsidedown dogs.

i just found this hilarious site for all you dog lovers out there. the idea is simple: take a photo of your dog lying on it's back and rotate it upside down, and, whoopee, a funny loose skin face appears.



i'll post a photo of my little critter once i get her to stay still on her back long enough for a photo...

changing the scenery with the perfect bag.

the holidays are family time, and in this nomadic world, it means also traveling time. like many others, i pack my knick-knacks, presents, and head to another city to visit relatives.

packing is always such a hassle: i try taking only what i'll need to avoid a suitcase (and having to carry it up and down six flights of stairs which is too strenuous even with a polycarbonate rimowa suitcase), but figuring out the essentials in this nordic (sic!) climate can be quite tricky in a family of six people and four dogs with endless energy. my guidelines so far have been that everything needs to fit nicely into a weekend holdall.

my good old issey miyake bag has served me well throughout the years. i like the rugged look and the multiple internal pockets which are great for organizing. unfortunately, it is slightly on the small side and i often end up carrying additional shopping bags, which kinda ruins the charm, don't you think?



since it's not for work, a casual holdall works just fine. therefore, i've considered going larger and shinier with my weekend bag, and i really like the line raf simons did for eastpack. since i am not exactly a backpack kinda girl, i'd go for this:

fab fibres of the 70's.

this amazing and, at the time, technically advanced commercial was used to promote the happy synthetic fibre revolution of the mid-seventies. naturally, new fabrics required new detergents which were able to cleanse at low temperatures -- the fibres were more or less plastic and could not cope with warmth.

i still remember quite clearly that while i was growing up the promise that made a successful detergent was cleansing power in cool water. while these days cool temperatures are tantamount in importance, the reason does not derive from the fibres themselves as much as from saving energy and water.



to keep it real, instead of coral, try these detergent nuts a.k.a. sapindus mukorossi out. they work and are environmentally friendly!

dilemma with the classics.

i've got a problem of my own concoction: if see a clear designer ripoff, i am unable to purchase it no matter how amazing and out-of-reach the original is for me. if i am unaware of the original, buying a copy is not a problem nor do i dwell on having copies of items i find out about afterwards. my inability adheres only to pre-knowledge.

while it is clear that the line between being a blatant copy and a garment inspired by some designer is somewhat vague, there are several really clear cases which cause too many headaches to my liking. to my detriment, the same dilemma applies to furniture and jewelry, as well, and when i see a jacobsen "inspired" chair, i cannot help feelings of betrayal flowing over me.

i am not exactly sure what the reason behind all this is, but it has something to do with knowing i'm abusing a designer's talent. knowledge changes behavior. in other words, i've internalized the fashionista's command:

"thou shall not knowingly purchase designer knockoffs."

in case this sounds too mother theresa to you, let me assure you my tendency to abuse younger designers is much more prominent than my ability to ignore known tokens of fashion history. perhaps it is because of the often apparent difference in quality and craftmanship; i can create something similar myself when it comes to young designers and, moreover, their designs are not as iconic -- so down to the lower levels of hell it is for me, then...

the fact that i do follow fashion (and design) -- luckily quite sporadically compared to a true fashionista, to be honest, since my interests are far too wide for concentrating on runway shows and buying glossies -- i guess i tend to spot copies around more than the average person: i see mouret dresses and faux spy bags everywhere around me and, therefore, fake prada or vuitton bags (which i do not claim i recognize nor care to) are just the beginning of my consumer neverevers. because my style is not about owning the latest and the trendiest garments, but rather a collection of seasoned favorites and some oddities (and obviously, several tragic do-not-evers), i can ignore the temptation at the store when i realize i'm seeing a knockoff product.

nevertheless, from time to time, i wish i wasn't aware of the original source because i can't bring myself to purchase an item i really like just because it isn't an original. for example, louis vuitton's iconic leopard scarf was copied by zara this fall, but i'm still torn for not being able to bring myself to buy it because i just cannot afford the original (retails at a mere 470€). at the moment my fave rant is directed the abundance of red soles on cheap and crappy shoes...

in addition to the aforementioned scarf, there are a few classics i would like to own. two of them are chanel, which is prolly not a huge surprise from such a monument of a fashion house.

the first is the quilted handbag known as 2.55. i'd like the reissue jumbo (or large), in black caviar leather and silver hardware. before i can afford one, i will not buy a quilted bag. the other one is the classic boucle tweed jacket. i want mine all black and would not mind some military inspired detailing like in this photo i snatched from some blog (sorry!) a while back. both are eternally stylish and can be worn from now, combined with jeans and a flowing tee, till i've got my other foot in the grave and the other one on a banana peel.



obviously, my problem is not exactly severe. if i'm never able to afford a chanel original, i can manage quite well without a quilted bag or a tweed jacket: there are still a number of exciting styles to choose from. the stylist in me will no doubt suffer, but my elitist claims the moral upper hand. such is the baggage one gathers from knowledge... (hahaha!)

wishy washy part two: books.

all i want for xmas... continues with some food for thought.

1. a mercy by toni morrison.
morrison reapproaches slavery but this time crossing and challenging racial boundaries.

2. 2666: a novel by roberto bolaño.
a 900 page murder mystery and philosophical exploration.

3. indignation by philip roth.
i'm hoping it will be another masterpiece of the troubles of the masculine.

4. when you are engulfed in flames by david sedaris.
sedaris goes through midlife crisis. a sure gem.

5. i was told there'd be cake by sloane crosley.
a cross between sedaris and carrie bradshaw, could this be a piece of chick lit i might be able to finish?

6. the winners by julio cortazar.
a classic by one of my favorite authors.

7. brief interviews with hideous men by david foster wallace.
supposedly a very uneven collection of essays with a few brilliant anomalies worthy of reading the whole thing. if you like wallace, that is.

8. dangerous laughter by steven millhauser.
almost chekhovian formality characterizes this much anticipated collection of stories.

9. puhdistus by sofi oksanen.
the finlandia literary price winner of 2008.

10. kohtuuttomuus by pirkko saisio.
another much awaited novel by an excellent writer.

wishy washy part one: accessories.

all i want for xmas... just in case santa stumbles upon my blog.

1. red tartan scarf from vivienne westwood. a classic wool scarf in a hefty size of 50"x50" (approx. 130x130cm).



2. a fummel + kram pac-man scarf from colette. i am fond of cheeky takes on the keffieh, and this one sports a hand-embroidered pacman game with pompoms. for the inner kid.



3. anything from katherine sturgis's amazing collection of bracelets. the combination of silk thread, vintage rhinestones and silver chains is both delicate and rough and appeals to both the girly magpie and the need to remain androgyne. i may actually attempt making similar ones myself...



4. prada clutch bag from their mordore stripes line. classy, but not in the least over the top, it could work from day to a casual evening out. (fyi, raffaello network has a sale on prada and some other brands...)



5. my friend aino makes these pretty amazing cursed heart necklaces for her i know why no label. i'm also fond of her take on id-tags. available at helsinki10.

the scent of a holiday.

i like xmas mostly because it is the only precious time of year when my dispersed family spends time together under the same roof, but also because it is an excuse for having the scent of glorious spices around the house all the time. i am fond of warm spicy scents and the holiday season is my time to stock up on shower gels and body lotions for the rest of the year (and if i run out, there's always kiehl's and their coriander body wash).

***
start preparing for the season with some coffee flavored gingerbread to enjoy with an afternoon latte, and the basic, but always delicious carrot cake.

latte gingerbread

1,5 dl syrup
1,5 dl milk
2 tbsp instant espresso
2,5 dl sugar
3 tsp cinnamon
1 tbsp baking soda
100g butter
7,75 dl all purpose flour

1 egg white
around 2,5 dl icing sugar

1. briefly boil syrup, milk, coffee, cinnamon and sugar, remove from stove. add baking soda and butter in cubes.
2. let cool slightly and add flour.
3. let the dough cool for a few hours or overnight.
4. roll out the dough thinly and cut into shapes. bake at 200° until brown. let cool.
5. blend egg white and icing sugar until smooth and decorate.


carrot cake

5 dl all purpose flour
4 dl sugar
4 tsp baking powder
2 tsp cinnamon
2 tsp nutmeg
1 dl ground nuts
4 eggs
1,25 dl oil (sunflower)
6 dl finely grated carrots

100 g cream cheese
1 tbsp butter
1 tsp vanilla essence (or 1 tbsp lemon juice)
around 200g icing sugar

1. mix all the dry ingredients
2. break eggs, add oil and carrots. mix well.
3. add the dry ingredients into the carrot mix.
4. pour into a greased and crumbed tin, bake at 180° for about an hour. let cool completely.
5. mix cream cheese and butter until smooth, add flavoring.
6. mix with icing sugar until thick and smooth, pile on top of cake. decorate with nuts.

***
i don't do holiday decorations at home, but i do want a tree. i'd prefer a live one for the amazing scent, but being away for a fortnight to visit relatives does not a happy tree make. this year i also hauled my tree decorations to my parents' so that we could have a new look there without buying an extra set of ornaments.

therefore, we just got a teeny tiny (and slightly tacky) little tree and some new decorative balls: small black ones from ikea, beautiful muted colored ones from habitat and the outrageous goldfish with a feather tail from skanno.

keep your borders in check, ladies.

the finnish independence day is celebrated on december 6th, and the most followed party method is to get trashed the day before and lounge in front of the telly to watch the president's independence day gala. this year instead of going out on the eve of the main event, we held a small house party on the day itself.

plenty of bubbly and cheese, a punch with a very secret recipe, and a team of extremely judgmental trend heads we were ready to take apart the outfits people chose to wear to the presidential castle. every year the finnish elite astonish me (and several others) with their inability to put together ensembles that work as wholes. again, there were some clear faux-pas, for example boobs popping out, au naturel faces and a pant suit (!), but my main issue this year was with the lack of proper undergarments: sheer fabrics and strapless gowns require corsets and shaping underwear or the end result is lumpy and formless. investing on suitable and well fitting underwear is just as important as getting the perfect dress.

while screaming snarky remarks create most of the fun, there are always perfectly balanced gems in the lot. this year my favorite was anna abreu. she looks age appropriate and fresh.

(photo: atte kajova)

molecular gastronomy.

yes yes, i am aware that molecular gastronomy is officially out, or has been out for such a long time it is officially back. foams and little weird droplets of unfathomable stuff appear on plates everywhere, and that's just not cool, right? ('that' referring to being everywhere, not the droplets themselves... english 101, where are you when i need you desperately?) well whatever, and good riddance of thinking cool, i say. i still want to get a reservation at el bulli and experience the art of cookery/chemistry by ferran adrià.

in the meanwhile, i intend to get a book of el bulli recipes and start my own experimental kitchen lab. therefore, i hope someone in or visiting the nyc area gets me this kit from dean & deluca. hint hint.

sedaris.

continuing on the topic of favorite authors, i must mention david sedaris. my love for his self-deprecating humor started with me talk pretty one day (little, brown and company 2000), and has continued ever since. his observational skills concentrate on the every day absurdities of life and it seems his curiosity pushes him towards inexplicable explanations, as paradoxical as that may sound. he's just incredibly funny.

sedaris on letterman talking about, ahem, accessories for men.

velocifero.

monday night ladytron performed at tavastia. it was my third (or fourth?) time seeing them live and while i'm not too impressed by their latest album, velocifero, their concentration on new material wasn't too bothersome. one of the most stylish bands i can think of, ladytron hold a special place in my heart, especially from their times of minimalist kraftverkian stage and video presence. helen's voice has an enchanting quality to it, but as we stood to the right of the stage, it was somewhat disturbing to see the mannerisms required for her signature stylization which sound effortless but were nothing but judging by her physical twitching.



here's "runaway" from their new album which definitely continues in the ladytron style mode we've come to know.

knits 2.0

i am stunned and mesmerized by sandra backlund's knits. she creates hand-knit masterpieces which challenge the form of the body (and probably the courage of the wearer), but are such a great example of handicraft taken to the next level with a formidable oomph factor, that i just have to sit back, catch my breath and admire.

from last breath and bruises collection:



from ink blot test collection:




from body skin and hair collection:



(i apologize for the lame title... 2.0 is soooo 2.0, right?)

let there be light.

i am fond of classic crystal chandeliers, but find them hardly appropriate anywhere else than the bathroom. call me strange, but i find the restroom a place where either zen-like serenity or decadent excess become fashions of choice. otherwise i like simple playfulness when it comes to interiors.

michael mchale has reinvented the chandelier by using construction materials, such as piping, to create cool, rugged light fixtures. you can choose from swarovski or bohemian crystals which are incorporated into a design of recycled materials.

my favorite is the five bulb compact chandelier, below, where crystals are illuminated by five refrigerator bulbs.

outliers.

my simple claim about why most americans (stress on the word 'most' and not restricting the generalization on one nationality) cannot fundamentally understand a social democratic state has, for a while now, been that their view on success and failure are individual based. my basic tenet is that they cannot tolerate a political system where free-riding is possible: the idea that someone got something out of the system without individual effort hurts their ideal of singular success stories. i collided into my "revelation" when trying to explain our society to friends and acquaintances in the u.s.: the response was always admiring, but ended with a doubt about mooches. how did we deal with abuse of the system? how could we pay taxes knowing that somebody was just claiming the benefits without a need, that we supported the lifestyle of laziness? i explained that it was because we have internalized the fact that people are not solely responsible for what goes on in their life and whether they thrive or collapse under pressure. it does not agree with the american ideal of the self-made man. logically, failure is also accredited to the individual despite our psychological tendency to think our own failures are not our own fault.

americans base (and others who cheer for the right wing rather than the welfare state) their political system on liberalism in its purest forms. pure liberalism (or libertarianism) places responsibility on the individual, but more or less ignores the fact that not everyone starts the same nor is surrounded by the same opportunities. true to their name, liberalists believe that similar freedoms or liberty maximized, is the most important factor in creating equality. their thinking is faulty, as has been proven by liberalists themselves. john rawls, who's often named as The Liberalist Thinker, started his theory of justice (1971) from the simple realization that people are not born equal and these inequalities tend to follow them throughout life, and as much as rawls's analysis was insufficient, his reluctance to give credit to the singular greatness of those who succeed, rightly places him near the top of political thinkers.

to my surprise, malcolm gladwell has uttered the same thought in his new book outliers (little, brown and company 2008). he claims that we are too keen on explaining success through individual effort and strenuous work, and that we often ignore the advantages and possibilities that are enjoyed by those who do, in fact, succeed. it does not mean that success stories happen despite individual work and that we could not take pleasure and congratulate ourselves for our own triumphs, not in the least. nevertheless, it is quite a different story to take singular credit for one's victories and think that this choice to ignore the realities of what enabled the success somehow works as a good basis for social justice.

david leonhardt writes in his ny times book review:

"Many people, I think, have an instinctual understanding of this idea (even if Gladwell, in the interest of setting his thesis against conventional wisdom, doesn’t say so). That’s why parents spend so much time worrying about what school their child attends. They don’t really believe the child is so infused with greatness that he or she can overcome a bad school, or even an average one. And yet when they look back years later on their child’s success — or their own — they tend toward explanations that focus on the individual. Devastatingly, if cheerfully, Gladwell exposes the flaws in these success stories we tell ourselves."

gladwell's capability to express ideas clearly and his reputation as a writer give me hope that this simple realization would gain more ground among people. it might work as a stepping stone for creating social minimums which were actually sufficient. hooray.